Evidence Family

Directory · 11 entries

Sourcing standards directory

This directory lists published rules on sourcing, accuracy and attribution, taken from each body's own code, policy or directive. Each rule is quoted or closely paraphrased from the document named. The Washington Post, for example, prefers two independent sources for facts that depend on confidential informants 1, and the US intelligence directive ICD 206 asks citations to reference the most original source 6. Blank cells mean the document read did not state the fact.

Last checked 6 November 2026

11 / 11

Notes

  • The Washington Post rule applies to stories that depend on confidential informants, not to every story 1.
  • ICD 206 sets no minimum number of sources 6.

Rules and charges change. Check the official source linked on this page before you pay or travel. Spotted an error? Email hello@evidencefamily.com.

Sources

  1. The Washington Post: Policies and Standards
  2. NPR: Accuracy (NPR Ethics Handbook)
  3. Society of Professional Journalists: SPJ's Code of Ethics (revised 4 October 2026)
  4. Editors' Code of Practice Committee: The Code (in force from 1 January 2025)
  5. Deutscher Presserat: Pressekodex (Fassung vom 19. März 2025)
  6. Office of the Director of National Intelligence: ICD 206, Sourcing Requirements for Disseminated Analytic Products (copy hosted by the Federation of American Scientists)
  7. Office of the Director of National Intelligence: ICD 203, Analytic Standards (2 January 2015)
  8. ICMJE: Recommendations, Overlapping Publications
  9. ICMJE: Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (updated January 2026)
  10. Thomson Reuters: The Trust Principles
  11. Ministère de la Culture: Presentation of Agence France Presse
  12. Cabinet Office: Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction, Implementation of its Conclusions (Cm 6492, March 2005)